RSS Feed

Telling What We’re Not Seeing

Telling What We’re Not Seeing

            “Are my glasses on the shelf above the washer?”

            This query came from my husband, calling from the car. He had thrown the bikes on the rack and was driving to Huntington Beach to ride with our son. I went to check; yes, they were there. I asked if he wanted me to bring them to him, but he said no, that’s OK. He’d just keep wearing his sunglasses.

            David and I both have very weak eyes, and we’ve passed that unfortunate trait onto Christopher. We regularly dole out small fortunes for glasses so we can read, drive, and peer at computer screens, prescription sunglasses to fend off the violent southern California sun, and contact lenses to indulge Christopher’s teenage vanity.

            In the “mistakes” column of the parental record I keep in my head, I didn’t realize Christopher needed glasses until he failed an eye test at St. Barnabas School when he was 5. As soon as the slip came home, the realization hit me. How could I not have known? He’d sit close to the TV (what little he was allowed to watch in those days), and in the car when I’d crow, “Look at that pug dog!” or point out something else, he’d seem to miss it. The ophthalmologist tried to console me, telling me he saw this regularly with kids Christopher’s age. “They don’t know how to tell you what they’re not seeing,” he said in a comforting tone, but I still felt negligent and awful. He probably should have been wearing glasses since he was 3.

            When David and Christopher got home from their ride, David was wandering from room to room distractedly. “I can’t find my glasses,” he said. “My new ones.” The pair I’d confirmed finding on the shelf was an old pair. In fact, his glasses were so new that I hadn’t even thought of them when I checked the shelf after his call.  The new pair were the latest thing, slim and light and, of course, wildly expensive.

            For the next half hour or so, we rummaged everywhere in the house, garage, and car, checking the same places over and over, the glove box, the shelves, even all the drawers and cabinets on the outside chance that he might have stuffed the glasses somewhere odd. I was getting exasperated. “Where could you have put them? After you put on your sunglasses, where did you put your glasses?”

            “I have a terrible feeling,” David finally said. He might have set the glasses, in their elegant slender case, on the roof of the car when he was putting the bike rack on. “No,” I said firmly.  “You wouldn’t do that. Not with a brand-new [insert price here] pair of glasses.”  More foraging for the glasses followed, taking on a slightly frantic edge now.

            Finally, we got in the car, and drove slowly through the streets in our neighborhood, the route David had taken to get to the 405 freeway. We eyed the street and gutter, vainly hoping to find the intact case with the specs safely inside. When we hit Cherry Avenue, a very busy artery that leads to the 405, I spotted a small, black shape on the side of the road. “No, it’s just rag or a bag,” I reported after David slowed down a bit. But before we gave up the search and drove back home, David wanted to go back and check again. I hopped out and picked up the “rag.” Its edges were pinked, and it was stamped “Ralph Lauren.” It was the cleaning cloth for the new glasses, the one tucked inside the case.

            I absent-mindedly wondered if any neighbors were driving by, and what they might think as they saw me groveling through the trash bin at the bus stop closest to where the cleaning cloth lay in the gutter.  We walked up and down the busy street, thinking, hoping, that maybe someone had found the glasses and tossed them after realizing that the very strong prescription made them useless for anyone else. “The fact that the cleaning cloth was there by itself isn’t a good sign,” I said. We both felt slightly sick—the glasses were less than two weeks old, and we hadn’t even paid the charge on the credit card yet.

            We decided to give up, and as we walked back to the car, I saw something glinting in the gutter. One lens, scratched beyond repair, and brutally separated from the frames. We both already knew that we weren’t going to find the glasses, that there was no way the case could have withstood being run over, but neither of us had said as much yet. Now the evidence of the mishap was irrefutable.

            I felt like crying. David kept his face impassive, but I could tell he felt terrible, too. I thought of the Raymond Carver story called “A Small, Good Thing,” a devastating account of a little boy, Scotty, knocked into the curb by a car as he walks to school. The child doesn’t survive the accident, and the excruciating details of his parents’ grief still haunt me, nearly 30 years after I read that story.

            “Well,” I say, trying to force a brisk, cheery, tone.  “If something had to be crushed under a car, thank God it wasn’t one of us. Thank God we picked up a cleaning cloth, and not a child’s shoe.” This seems not to console David, but to irritate him further.  I grant that I wasn’t clear in explaining the connection I’d suddenly had to that shocking Carver story.

            The credit card bill will arrive sometime in the next few days, with the charge for the pulverized glasses on it. We’ll pay it, wincing. But unlike many losses, this is only stuff, and only money, all of which can be replaced.

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

About treacycolbert

I make my living by writing about health care. I've always written about life's chastening effect, but just as a way of sorting it out for myself. After years of doing this and keeping these essays quiet, I decided to put some of these impressions out there on this blog. Thanks for reading, and let me know what you think.

9 responses »

  1. So visual, no pun intended. Haven’t we all been here? I love this piece. More, please.

    Reply
  2. Oh – I can personally relate to the “lost glasses” pain, Treacy! Thanks for sharing another poignant episode – Please keep them coming….

    Reply
  3. Okay, I think if you paid via Amex, there is automatic purchase insurance even if the loss was self-inflicted. Or, I am betting that your homeowner’s insurance will cover it, minus the deductible, which is probably less than a new pair of glasses.

    My stomach was in knots reading this. And I wonder if contact lenses maybe aren’t a vanity, as you are less likely to take them “on and off” (or in and out) as you would a pair of frames. I’m just sayin’…

    Reply
  4. Hi, JA, I didn’t add this detail to the story, but if you can believe the confluence of errors, we aren’t eligible for “loss protection” on the purchase. Why? I told David I would buy his new glasses as an anniversary present, and paid the deposit on a credit card I use only for gifts. When the glasses came in, David went and picked them up, paying the balance with the joint card we use for most purchases. After they were smushed, we learned that “loss protection” won’t apply because the cost was not paid in its entirety using one card. Oy! There’s a lesson in there somewhere, and I think it may have something to do w/ not buying practical, fuddy-duddy, nonromantic gifts for an anniversary . . .

    Reply
  5. God, I, too, remember that Carver story, “A Small, Good Thing”. (And speaking of Raymond Carver, I still have a volume of his poetry, called Ultramarine, that you and Mark gave me in 1987 when Miranda was born! Not a typical present for a new mom, but of course typical is never what we strove for.) So, another great piece, Treacy! For a while I could not find the link to your blog, but I have added it to my own blog so I can easily click over.

    Reply
  6. I kept holding my breath and hoping that in the next paragraph, somehow you really would find them . . . after all, you did find the cloth.
    I have felt the same way when looking for something lost – that surely, if we just keep looking, it will turn up! Then, at some point the realization comes that it is time to grieve the loss. Frank taught me to look at all lost and broken items as an opportunity to buy something new, however David’s glasses were new!!
    Love reading these, Treacy!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: